Leida Sharpe (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Hey, uh, just thought I'd point this out: the type effectiveness section is empty, and the gender ratio says 0% male, 0% female. Shouldn't it say genderless? Or the actual rat...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 21:55, 12 October 2016
Hey, uh, just thought I'd point this out: the type effectiveness section is empty, and the gender ratio says 0% male, 0% female. Shouldn't it say genderless? Or the actual ratio? Then again, I never was here when it was out, so I'm not sure of the actual accuracy or corrections needing to be made... But I still thought I should mention this, as it seemed quite odd. -Sharpe. Leida Sharpe. (talk) 21:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)