16,987
edits
m
no edit summary
Leida Sharpe (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Hey, uh, just thought I'd point this out: the type effectiveness section is empty, and the gender ratio says 0% male, 0% female. Shouldn't it say genderless? Or the actual rat...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey, uh, just thought I'd point this out: the type effectiveness section is empty, and the gender ratio says 0% male, 0% female. Shouldn't it say genderless? Or the actual ratio? Then again, I never was here when it was out, so I'm not sure of the actual accuracy or corrections needing to be made... But I still thought I should mention this, as it seemed quite odd. [[User:Leida Sharpe|-Sharpe. Leida Sharpe.]] ([[User talk:Leida Sharpe|talk]]) 21:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC) | Hey, uh, just thought I'd point this out: the type effectiveness section is empty, and the gender ratio says 0% male, 0% female. Shouldn't it say genderless? Or the actual ratio? Then again, I never was here when it was out, so I'm not sure of the actual accuracy or corrections needing to be made... But I still thought I should mention this, as it seemed quite odd. [[User:Leida Sharpe|-Sharpe. Leida Sharpe.]] ([[User talk:Leida Sharpe|talk]]) 21:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
Genders weren't a thing pre-v3, that's why a gender ratio cannot be added. It's not currently (and probably never will be) added to any current or future version of Vortex again. As for type effectiveness, I guess someone just hasn't got around to doing it yet, feel free to step in. [[User:Patrick|Patrick]] ([[User_talk:Patrick|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Patrick|Contribs]]) 07:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC) | |||